← back to the files
LC-015 Securities fraud · New York 1996

Eddie Antar — the discounter who skimmed cash, then faked the profits

skimmingstock-fraudconvictedextradited1990s-2000s
Losses
~$145M shareholder fraud · $73.5M SEC judgment
Scheme
Skim-then-inflate securities fraud
Closed
Guilty plea 1996 · 82 mos, 1997
Status
Convicted

Summary

In New Jersey, across the late 1980s and 1990s, the federal courts dismantled one of the era's defining retail-stock frauds: the rise and rigged accounts of Crazy Eddie, the New York consumer-electronics chain built by Eddie Antar. The scheme had two phases that ran in opposite directions. For years before the company went public, Antar and his family skimmed cash to evade taxes and pad their own pockets. Then, to prepare a stock for sale and inflate its price, they reversed course, reducing the skim and laundering previously hidden money back into the books as phantom sales, while overstating inventory to fabricate profits.

The outcome was a conviction that survived a detour. After fleeing the United States, Antar was located in Israel and arrested on June 24, 1992, and extradited the following January. A jury convicted him of securities fraud in July 1993, but in 1995 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacated the conviction, finding that the trial judge's conduct had created an appearance of bias. Rather than face a second trial, Antar pleaded guilty in May 1996 to racketeering conspiracy and, in 1997, was sentenced to 82 months in federal prison.

The financial measures of the fraud were large for a mid-sized retailer. In a related civil action the SEC obtained a judgment of $73,496,432, plus interest, against Antar in July 1990, and the criminal case treated the scheme as having defrauded shareholders of well over $100 million. The chain itself, which once carried a stock-market value in the hundreds of millions, collapsed into bankruptcy and liquidation in 1989 after new owners discovered that tens of millions of dollars of reported inventory did not exist.

What makes the case a fixture of accounting and audit teaching is the elegance of the deception rather than its size. The same family that had spent years proving it could hide income then proved it could invent income, and auditors who counted inventory were defeated by employees who moved stock between stores, faked count sheets, and papered the gaps with fraudulent documents. The fraud closed because an insider, Antar's own cousin and former chief financial officer, eventually turned and explained exactly how it had been done.

Timeline

1971. The store is named.
Eddie Antar's electronics business on Kings Highway in Brooklyn adopted the name Crazy Eddie, soon amplified by a manic radio and television pitchman whose tagline insisted the prices were insane.
From 1979. The skim.
Antar and family members took cash out of the business off the books, evading taxes and understating income, and moved money into accounts abroad, including in Israel.
1980–1983. Reversing the engine.
Anticipating a public offering, the insiders reduced the amount of cash skimmed. Lower skimming meant higher reported earnings, manufacturing the appearance of rapid profit growth ahead of the sale.
September 13, 1984. The IPO.
Crazy Eddie went public on NASDAQ. The stock opened around $8 and, amid the fabricated growth story, rose above $75 a share by early 1986.
1985–1987. Inventory and the Panama Pump.
To sustain the illusion, insiders overstated inventory and inflated sales, including by wiring previously skimmed funds from Israel through accounts in Panama opened under false names and depositing them back into company accounts as if they were store revenue.
1987. The takeover and discovery.
After a hostile takeover, new owners conducting a physical inventory found a shortfall of tens of millions of dollars, exposing the fraud. Antar resigned and federal and SEC investigations opened.
July 16, 1990. The SEC judgment.
The SEC obtained a civil judgment of $73,496,432, plus interest, against Eddie Antar in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.
1990. Flight.
Facing mounting legal jeopardy, Antar left the United States and lived abroad under assumed identities, prompting an international search led by the U.S. Marshals Service.
June 24, 1992. Capture.
Antar was located and arrested in Israel. After contesting extradition in the Israeli courts, he was returned to the United States in January 1993.
July 1993. Conviction.
A federal jury convicted Antar of securities fraud; he initially faced a sentence of roughly twelve and a half years.
1995. Conviction vacated.
The Third Circuit overturned the conviction, finding that the trial judge had created an appearance of bias, and ordered the case reassigned.
May 1996 · 1997. Plea and sentence.
Rather than be retried, Antar pleaded guilty to racketeering conspiracy in May 1996 and was sentenced in 1997 to 82 months in prison. He died of cancer on September 10, 2016, at age 68.

The Pitchman and the Family Firm

Crazy Eddie was, on its surface, a model of brash retail success. From the original Brooklyn store, the chain expanded across the New York metropolitan area on a promise of the lowest prices, hammered home by a pitchman whose frantic delivery and the slogan that the prices were insane made the brand a regional fixture. Behind the showmanship was a tightly held family business, run by Eddie Antar with relatives in key positions, including his cousin Sam E. Antar, an accountant who became chief financial officer around the time the company went public.

The same family closeness that built the chain also concealed its first fraud. For years the Antars took cash out of the registers before it was recorded, a practice that suppressed reported income and reduced the taxes owed, while channeling money into accounts overseas. This was not, at that stage, a fraud against shareholders, because there were no public shareholders; it was tax evasion and self-dealing inside a private company. But it established the infrastructure of the later crime: foreign accounts, false documentation, and a workforce accustomed to moving money where the books would not show it.

The decision to take the company public converted that machinery to a new purpose. A stock is priced on reported earnings and growth, so the very income the family had been hiding became valuable to display. In the years before the 1984 offering, the insiders simply skimmed less. Because the skim had been depressing reported profits, reducing it produced a flattering curve of accelerating earnings that made Crazy Eddie look like a fast-growing company precisely when it needed to. The fraud had not changed its tools; it had reversed their direction.

The Engine Run in Reverse

Once Crazy Eddie was public, the incentive was no longer to hide income but to manufacture it, and the scheme escalated accordingly. Two mechanisms did the work. The first was inventory overstatement. Because reported profit rises when inventory is valued higher, inflating the count of goods on hand directly inflated earnings. Employees moved merchandise between stores ahead of auditors, falsified count sheets, and recorded inventory the company did not possess, so that the figure auditors relied upon was a fiction the insiders controlled.

The second mechanism became known in later accounts as the Panama Pump, and it solved a specific problem: how to make sales appear larger without real customers. Money that had been skimmed in earlier years and parked in Israeli accounts was wired to accounts in Panama opened under false names, then sent back into Crazy Eddie's own bank accounts in the United States, where it was recorded on the books as proceeds from sales. Cash the family had stolen from the company was thus laundered into the company and re-presented as revenue, boosting reported same-store sales, the metric investors watched most closely.

Together the two techniques produced a stock that climbed from its offering price of about $8 to more than $75 a share by early 1986, lifting the paper fortune of the insiders who held the shares. The arithmetic was self-reinforcing while it lasted: fabricated growth raised the price, the higher price validated the growth story, and the insiders could sell into the strength they had engineered. What none of it created was a real business capable of producing the earnings the accounts described, which meant the gap between the reported company and the actual one widened with every quarter.

The Count That Could Not Be Faked

The fraud ended where it had always been most vulnerable: a physical count of the goods. In 1987 the company was taken over, and the new owners did what the insiders most feared, conducting their own inventory of what Crazy Eddie actually held. The result was a shortfall measured in tens of millions of dollars, the unmistakable signature of inventory that had existed only on paper. Antar resigned, the stock that had been worth hundreds of millions cratered, and federal prosecutors and the SEC opened the investigations that would consume the next decade.

The company did not survive the discovery. Crazy Eddie filed for bankruptcy in 1989 and was liquidated, its stores closed and its NASDAQ listing terminated. In July 1990 the SEC obtained a civil judgment of $73,496,432, plus interest, against Eddie Antar, and the criminal process moved toward trial. Antar, however, had already left the country in 1990, living abroad under false identities while the U.S. Marshals Service pursued him, until he was located and arrested in Israel on June 24, 1992, and extradited to the United States in January 1993.

The criminal case then took a detour that delayed but did not prevent its resolution. A jury convicted Antar of securities fraud in July 1993, but in 1995 the Third Circuit vacated the conviction, holding that the trial judge's statements and conduct had created an appearance of bias requiring reassignment of the case. Facing a second trial, Antar instead pleaded guilty in May 1996 to racketeering conspiracy and was sentenced in 1997 to 82 months in prison. His cousin Sam E. Antar, the former chief financial officer, had cooperated with the government, and his detailed account of how the books were rigged became the authoritative explanation of the scheme.

The Five Factors

01
Concealment infrastructure outlives its first purpose
The Antars built foreign accounts, false documents, and a compliant workforce to hide income from the tax authorities, then repurposed the same machinery to invent income for shareholders. Capabilities created for one fraud rarely stay confined to it. An organization practiced at deceiving one audience is equipped to deceive the next.
02
Reducing a hidden negative can manufacture fake growth
Because the skim had been depressing reported profits, simply skimming less produced a flattering trend of accelerating earnings before the IPO. Growth can be fabricated by removing a concealed drag as easily as by adding fictional gains. Earnings curves engineered just before a sale deserve particular suspicion.
03
Inventory is a soft target for accounting fraud
Profit rises with reported inventory, and inventory is countable only at a moment and a place the company can stage. Moving stock between locations and falsifying count sheets defeated the auditors' central test. Controls that depend on observing assets the suspect controls are weak precisely where it matters most.
04
Laundering can disguise stolen cash as revenue
The Panama Pump cycled previously skimmed money through offshore accounts and back into company books as sales, inflating the same-store-sales figure investors prized. When a firm can route its own hidden funds into its own revenue line, reported sales cease to measure real demand. Unexplained cash inflows recorded as revenue are a red flag, not a footnote.
05
The physical world eventually audits the paper
The scheme collapsed when new owners counted the actual goods and found tens of millions missing. Books can assert any quantity, but the inventory either exists or it does not. A fraud built on fictional assets survives only until someone with both access and incentive insists on verifying them directly.

Aftermath

Crazy Eddie's collapse erased a company once valued in the hundreds of millions and left shareholders holding stock the fraud had inflated and then destroyed. The civil reckoning was substantial: beyond the SEC's July 1990 judgment of $73,496,432 against Eddie Antar, civil litigation produced far larger aggregate claims, and Antar was ordered in connection with his plea to forfeit assets and pay penalties. The criminal resolution, an 82-month sentence after a vacated first conviction, closed the prosecution but recovered only a fraction of what investors had lost.

The case endured chiefly as a teaching instrument. Auditors, accounting students, and fraud examiners study Crazy Eddie as a near-complete catalog of methods: cash skimming, inventory inflation, the laundering of stolen funds into reported revenue, and the manipulation of the public's appetite for a growth story. Its most unusual feature is the insider account that explains it. Sam E. Antar, the former chief financial officer who helped engineer the fraud and then cooperated with prosecutors, spent decades afterward describing the scheme publicly, which gave the case an unusually detailed record of how each deception was constructed and concealed.

Eddie Antar served his sentence and lived quietly afterward, dying of cancer on September 10, 2016, at age 68. The chain he built is remembered as much for its pitchman as for its prosecution, but the durable lesson belongs to the accounts. A business can be made to look like anything on paper; what it cannot do indefinitely is reconcile that paper with the goods on the shelves, the cash in the bank, and the customers who either came or did not.

Lessons

  1. Distrust an earnings curve that accelerates just before a stock sale; growth can be manufactured by easing a hidden drag, not only by inventing gains.
  2. Treat inventory as a prime fraud vector; verify it by independent, unannounced count, because figures the company stages can hide enormous holes.
  3. Scrutinize cash that arrives from offshore accounts and lands in the revenue line; a firm routing its own hidden money into its own sales is faking demand.
  4. Recognize that the skills of tax evasion and securities fraud are the same skills aimed at different audiences; an organization practiced at hiding income can invent it.
  5. Insist on reconciling reported assets to the physical world; books assert quantities, but goods, cash, and customers either exist or they do not.

References